- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

A huge chess secret revealing to me by accident - not to be pushed around!

Firstly, CM Kingrusher-YouTube:
Black missed, Nc3+ followed by Qb6+ which picks up the unprotected rook on g1 - try and visualize this! :) was brilliant (!!) Although, I wish you could have seen this in your live game, I am confident that you can beat that GM in the next meeting. As to the not being pushed around the board, I see valid conclusions in the statement of truth also. I think that time control and clock have a play in the moving of pieces in games also. Knowing and studying from here is my focal point, and I will await any further publishing's or comments on the subject.

Firstly, CM Kingrusher-YouTube: Black missed, Nc3+ followed by Qb6+ which picks up the unprotected rook on g1 - try and visualize this! :) was brilliant (!!) Although, I wish you could have seen this in your live game, I am confident that you can beat that GM in the next meeting. As to the not being pushed around the board, I see valid conclusions in the statement of truth also. I think that time control and clock have a play in the moving of pieces in games also. Knowing and studying from here is my focal point, and I will await any further publishing's or comments on the subject.

(@)Kingscrusher-YouTube said in #1:

Comments on lichess.org/@/kingscrusher-youtube/blog/a-huge-chess-secret-revealing-to-me-by-accident-not-to-be-pushed-around/vz7XqBpD
Excellent post. Thanks for the insight, and after some thinking, I realized that I also have this issue in my games!

(@)Kingscrusher-YouTube said in #1: > Comments on lichess.org/@/kingscrusher-youtube/blog/a-huge-chess-secret-revealing-to-me-by-accident-not-to-be-pushed-around/vz7XqBpD Excellent post. Thanks for the insight, and after some thinking, I realized that I also have this issue in my games!

Very good blog- Jeremy Silman wrote about the same idea in HTRYC. He called it Macho chess and "pushing your own agenda".

"Will capablanca obey Marshall and defend d3? Of course not! He didn't become an unbeatable chess machine by hysterically catering to his opponent's whims."
Quote from the book. Silman describing so called "have to" moments in chess.

Very good blog- Jeremy Silman wrote about the same idea in HTRYC. He called it Macho chess and "pushing your own agenda". "Will capablanca obey Marshall and defend d3? Of course not! He didn't become an unbeatable chess machine by hysterically catering to his opponent's whims." Quote from the book. Silman describing so called "have to" moments in chess.

I love how you call us bunnies...

I love how you call us bunnies...

@userfriendly2 said in #6:

Very good blog- Jeremy Silman wrote about the same idea in HTRYC. He called it Macho chess and "pushing your own agenda".

"Will capablanca obey Marshall and defend d3? Of course not! He didn't become an unbeatable chess machine by hysterically catering to his opponent's whims."
Quote from the book. Silman describing so called "have to" moments in chess.

Yes agenda is a great alternative way of putting it ... many thanks

@userfriendly2 said in #6: > Very good blog- Jeremy Silman wrote about the same idea in HTRYC. He called it Macho chess and "pushing your own agenda". > > "Will capablanca obey Marshall and defend d3? Of course not! He didn't become an unbeatable chess machine by hysterically catering to his opponent's whims." > Quote from the book. Silman describing so called "have to" moments in chess. Yes agenda is a great alternative way of putting it ... many thanks

i honestly read your article and can not understand what you trying to say.. ?!

i honestly read your article and can not understand what you trying to say.. ?!