- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

One of The Greatest Games Ever Played

We actually covered this exact game in one of our old studies:

https://lichess.org/study/SDmqYRBo/k0aZ4nBy

But i thought he was called Nikolay Gusev?

We actually covered this exact game in one of our old studies: https://lichess.org/study/SDmqYRBo/k0aZ4nBy But i thought he was called Nikolay Gusev?

Probably is Y not E Averback, a well known soviet grandmaster.

Probably is Y not E Averback, a well known soviet grandmaster.

@jemir said in #4:

Probably is Y not E Averback, a well known soviet grandmaster.

That's a common blunder! As I said: "His opponent E. Auerbach is a mystery. Their game against Gusev seems to be their only recorded chess game."

People commonly mistake E. Auerbach for Y. Averbakh.

https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessplayer?pid=148098

@Phil224 said in #3:

We actually covered this exact game in one of our old studies:

But i thought he was called Nikolay Gusev?

Looks like you made a double blunder then! ;) Since in your study you list the opponent as GM Yuri Averbakh not E. Auerbach (as I mentioned above).

@jemir said in #4: > Probably is Y not E Averback, a well known soviet grandmaster. That's a common blunder! As I said: "His opponent E. Auerbach is a mystery. Their game against Gusev seems to be their only recorded chess game." People commonly mistake E. Auerbach for Y. Averbakh. https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessplayer?pid=148098 @Phil224 said in #3: > We actually covered this exact game in one of our old studies: > But i thought he was called Nikolay Gusev? Looks like you made a double blunder then! **;)** Since in your study you list the opponent as GM Yuri Averbakh not E. Auerbach (as I mentioned above).

@RuyLopez1000 You sure that it's E. Auerbach? Because if you use a more powerful database (chesscom for example) it shows white is Yuri Averbakh not E. Auerbach.
Screenshot 2026-01-30 143926.png

Are you saying chesscom is wrong? 🤔

@RuyLopez1000 You sure that it's E. Auerbach? Because if you use a more powerful database (chesscom for example) it shows white is Yuri Averbakh not E. Auerbach. ![Screenshot 2026-01-30 143926.png](https://image.lichess1.org/display?fmt=png&h=0&op=resize&path=LIB2dJNnd_3c.png&w=864&sig=d35dab612d939b09436561c363ccff023e38eb89) Are you saying chesscom is wrong? 🤔

@Phil224 said in #6:

@RuyLopez1000 You sure that it's E. Auerbach? Because if you use a more powerful database (chesscom for example) it shows white is Yuri Averbakh not E. Auerbach.

Are you saying chesscom is wrong? 🤔

Precisely! What did u expect from that shoddy website. XD.

@Phil224 said in #6: > @RuyLopez1000 You sure that it's E. Auerbach? Because if you use a more powerful database (chesscom for example) it shows white is Yuri Averbakh not E. Auerbach. > Are you saying chesscom is wrong? 🤔 Precisely! What did u expect from that shoddy website. XD.

What version of Stockfish are you running? I have 17.1 and it gives the position after 23. Qxd6 as clearly winning by depth 30.

What version of Stockfish are you running? I have 17.1 and it gives the position after 23. Qxd6 as clearly winning by depth 30.

Moral of the story: play g4, no matter the position. Almost always works haha.
Spectacular zugzwang that. Never seen nothing like it before.

Moral of the story: play g4, no matter the position. Almost always works haha. Spectacular zugzwang that. Never seen nothing like it before.