Comments on https://lichess.org/@/ruylopez1000/blog/one-of-the-greatest-games-ever-played/fgrWgREk
It would have been better to include the complete game
https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1472988
It would have been better to include the complete game
https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1472988
We actually covered this exact game in one of our old studies:
https://lichess.org/study/SDmqYRBo/k0aZ4nBy
But i thought he was called Nikolay Gusev?
We actually covered this exact game in one of our old studies:
https://lichess.org/study/SDmqYRBo/k0aZ4nBy
But i thought he was called Nikolay Gusev?
Probably is Y not E Averback, a well known soviet grandmaster.
Probably is Y not E Averback, a well known soviet grandmaster.
@jemir said in #4:
Probably is Y not E Averback, a well known soviet grandmaster.
That's a common blunder! As I said: "His opponent E. Auerbach is a mystery. Their game against Gusev seems to be their only recorded chess game."
People commonly mistake E. Auerbach for Y. Averbakh.
https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessplayer?pid=148098
@Phil224 said in #3:
We actually covered this exact game in one of our old studies:
But i thought he was called Nikolay Gusev?
Looks like you made a double blunder then! ;) Since in your study you list the opponent as GM Yuri Averbakh not E. Auerbach (as I mentioned above).
@jemir said in #4:
> Probably is Y not E Averback, a well known soviet grandmaster.
That's a common blunder! As I said: "His opponent E. Auerbach is a mystery. Their game against Gusev seems to be their only recorded chess game."
People commonly mistake E. Auerbach for Y. Averbakh.
https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessplayer?pid=148098
@Phil224 said in #3:
> We actually covered this exact game in one of our old studies:
> But i thought he was called Nikolay Gusev?
Looks like you made a double blunder then! **;)** Since in your study you list the opponent as GM Yuri Averbakh not E. Auerbach (as I mentioned above).
@RuyLopez1000 You sure that it's E. Auerbach? Because if you use a more powerful database (chesscom for example) it shows white is Yuri Averbakh not E. Auerbach.
Are you saying chesscom is wrong? 🤔
@RuyLopez1000 You sure that it's E. Auerbach? Because if you use a more powerful database (chesscom for example) it shows white is Yuri Averbakh not E. Auerbach.

Are you saying chesscom is wrong? 🤔
@Phil224 said in #6:
@RuyLopez1000 You sure that it's E. Auerbach? Because if you use a more powerful database (chesscom for example) it shows white is Yuri Averbakh not E. Auerbach.
Are you saying chesscom is wrong? 🤔
Precisely! What did u expect from that shoddy website. XD.
@Phil224 said in #6:
> @RuyLopez1000 You sure that it's E. Auerbach? Because if you use a more powerful database (chesscom for example) it shows white is Yuri Averbakh not E. Auerbach.
> Are you saying chesscom is wrong? 🤔
Precisely! What did u expect from that shoddy website. XD.
What version of Stockfish are you running? I have 17.1 and it gives the position after 23. Qxd6 as clearly winning by depth 30.
What version of Stockfish are you running? I have 17.1 and it gives the position after 23. Qxd6 as clearly winning by depth 30.
I used the analysis board on Lichess: https://lichess.org/analysis/2r1q1kr/p6p/1p1QPppB/4n3/4P3/2P5/PP2B2P/R5K1_b_-_-_0_23?color=white
@wgvgreen
I used the analysis board on Lichess: https://lichess.org/analysis/2r1q1kr/p6p/1p1QPppB/4n3/4P3/2P5/PP2B2P/R5K1_b_-_-_0_23?color=white
Moral of the story: play g4, no matter the position. Almost always works haha.
Spectacular zugzwang that. Never seen nothing like it before.
Moral of the story: play g4, no matter the position. Almost always works haha.
Spectacular zugzwang that. Never seen nothing like it before.

