- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

Short Fiction: The Destroyer of Kings

Wow. just read few paragraphs. I could not deliver as well as you do, such understanding, that I seem to share.
thanks you I will keep reading, in hope to get some idea of how much of that sharing can potentially finally be shared without jargon from the many disciplines where all such insight into the mamallian brain, including human, might have been collected and made automatic in abstract model cranked by CPUs and GPUs... in silica. But most importantly models for how we deal with chess tasks.

It promises. I am sure the rest is equally well presented.. if not I might come back and ramble some. Any how, already worth it. for anyone passing by. please keep at reading this. I will. (i have limited stamina to read long text, including my own, but this is well written, compared to me. I will keep giving sessions of my time to it). Kudos for this effort.

Why fiction, though. I do not see it yet. For now it seems more like essay. Possibly presenting as fiction, is allowing minimizing jargon and liberating the story telling needing to encompass such information touching many scientific disciplines from many decades already, at the big picture level, and digestible for a more general audience of passionate and curious chess enthusiast. Curious about how we might approach such a thing as chess play, in our heads.

ok. keyword: fastforward. taking a pause here. I applaud the time spent explaining the 2 sets of experiemtents one the organization and detection of decomposable signals underlying our visual field. and the other the plasticity aspect.

That development and environments feedback have a dynamical interaction, that is reflected in the brain cells layering and organization. If I can summarize.. to remember better. That plasticity, I did not know as well. but for the persitent well known plasticity principle prevalent in all I could be exposed to, touching neurobiology. (not my expertise, I have non anyway).

So I keep the technology fiction for later.. the fast forward is abrupt.. kudos for making the first part available.

Did you use some machine help on the linguistic side? (just checking, I am pretty sure this is of your inspiration, even if so). still wow... got to stop.. learning a lot of history. can you say a word about sources. and why fiction. so I can adjust my digestion of your blog later.. and not propagate the fiction, if not also telling the gist of the references that might me unreadable for all the target audience here.

Wow. just read few paragraphs. I could not deliver as well as you do, such understanding, that I seem to share. thanks you I will keep reading, in hope to get some idea of how much of that sharing can potentially finally be shared without jargon from the many disciplines where all such insight into the mamallian brain, including human, might have been collected and made automatic in abstract model cranked by CPUs and GPUs... in silica. But most importantly models for how we deal with chess tasks. It promises. I am sure the rest is equally well presented.. if not I might come back and ramble some. Any how, already worth it. for anyone passing by. please keep at reading this. I will. (i have limited stamina to read long text, including my own, but this is well written, compared to me. I will keep giving sessions of my time to it). Kudos for this effort. Why fiction, though. I do not see it yet. For now it seems more like essay. Possibly presenting as fiction, is allowing minimizing jargon and liberating the story telling needing to encompass such information touching many scientific disciplines from many decades already, at the big picture level, and digestible for a more general audience of passionate and curious chess enthusiast. Curious about how we might approach such a thing as chess play, in our heads. ok. keyword: fastforward. taking a pause here. I applaud the time spent explaining the 2 sets of experiemtents one the organization and detection of decomposable signals underlying our visual field. and the other the plasticity aspect. That development and environments feedback have a dynamical interaction, that is reflected in the brain cells layering and organization. If I can summarize.. to remember better. That plasticity, I did not know as well. but for the persitent well known plasticity principle prevalent in all I could be exposed to, touching neurobiology. (not my expertise, I have non anyway). So I keep the technology fiction for later.. the fast forward is abrupt.. kudos for making the first part available. Did you use some machine help on the linguistic side? (just checking, I am pretty sure this is of your inspiration, even if so). still wow... got to stop.. learning a lot of history. can you say a word about sources. and why fiction. so I can adjust my digestion of your blog later.. and not propagate the fiction, if not also telling the gist of the references that might me unreadable for all the target audience here.

The cat with blutooth devices? I guess, I might have some plausibility reading.. if in the past there was no qualms about ethical precautions, and if bluetooth usage has any actually science or technology purpose.. The lost cats from previous experiments descendants. is propbably where there is a increase in fiction. If you did use machine help, I would be curious about your input trace.

How to differentiate knowledge from fiction.. might be part of your exercise? sources. please.. can't wait..

The cat with blutooth devices? I guess, I might have some plausibility reading.. if in the past there was no qualms about ethical precautions, and if bluetooth usage has any actually science or technology purpose.. The lost cats from previous experiments descendants. is propbably where there is a increase in fiction. If you did use machine help, I would be curious about your input trace. How to differentiate knowledge from fiction.. might be part of your exercise? sources. please.. can't wait..

good take off into fiction. I appreciate.. I don't care anymore where the frontier was. I think it feels plausible progression.
I also have some understanding of cat behavior. But, perhaps I have doubts, about information coming that their body action would have no effect on... as something that you did inject in the first part. The dependency of sensory processing on the activity of the cat . or did I overinterpret.

nice top image, finnaly.. good package.. sorry for taking so much space in my review.. but I guess not so sorry too.
Very nice. reading. done.. I am also playing a game called stray. not done yet.. I might let this story linger and lurk over my play there....

good take off into fiction. I appreciate.. I don't care anymore where the frontier was. I think it feels plausible progression. I also have some understanding of cat behavior. But, perhaps I have doubts, about information coming that their body action would have no effect on... as something that you did inject in the first part. The dependency of sensory processing on the activity of the cat . or did I overinterpret. nice top image, finnaly.. good package.. sorry for taking so much space in my review.. but I guess not so sorry too. Very nice. reading. done.. I am also playing a game called stray. not done yet.. I might let this story linger and lurk over my play there....

Very interesting! Perfect describing qualities it was funny and also would knock some sense into people who are new!

Very interesting! Perfect describing qualities it was funny and also would knock some sense into people who are new!

@prathyush_sh said in #5:

Very interesting! Perfect describing qualities it was funny and also would knock some sense into people who are new!

Thanks for reading!

@prathyush_sh said in #5: > Very interesting! Perfect describing qualities it was funny and also would knock some sense into people who are new! Thanks for reading!

@NDpatzer said in #6:

Thanks for reading!

And me, no thanks?

@NDpatzer said in #6: > Thanks for reading! And me, no thanks?

@dboing said in #7:

And me, no thanks?

Thanks to you as well.

@dboing said in #7: > And me, no thanks? Thanks to you as well.