The Limits of Chess Rules: When Principles Become Traps

Chess is filled with strategic principles and so-called "rules of thumb," like "An attack on the wing should be met by a counterattack in the center." While these guidelines help players navigate complex positions, can they sometimes do more harm than good?
Dutch chess trainer Willy Hendriks, in Move First, Think Later, challenges the idea that such rules are universally applicable. He analyzes 34 games where White played 17.g4, finding that in only two cases was a central pawn move the best response. His conclusion? These rules serve more as post-game explanations than practical over-the-board advice. Even Mark Dvoretsky’s refined version—that an unprepared wing attack should be met with a timely central counterblow—boils down to a truism: "If the move is best, play it."

Chess Principles vs. Modern Pragmatism

While Hendriks raises valid points, some principles reflect the fundamental logic of chess. Controlling the center is essential, and players attacking on the flank often ensure they don’t allow a strong central response. What Hendriks’ analysis doesn’t account for is that White also understands these rules—strong players won’t push 17.g4 unless they see that Black cannot counter in the center.
Modern chess takes a flexible approach. Heuristics can guide play, but blindly following rules can hinder accurate position evaluation.

The Problem of Verbal Overshadowing

A psychological experiment (Hooler et al., 1996) provides an interesting parallel. Participants, including wine experts, were asked to taste and later recognize wines. One group simply tasted, while another wrote descriptions. The latter performed worse because complex details were lost in translation. This verbal overshadowing applies to chess—each position is unique, and reducing decisions to formulas can be misleading.

Chess is a Skill, Not Just Knowledge

Jonathan Rowson, in Chess for Zebras, argues that many players focus too much on accumulating knowledge rather than developing skill. A strong player isn’t one who memorizes rules but one who instinctively evaluates positions and makes practical decisions.

Final Thoughts

Chess principles are useful when applied wisely, but no rule should override concrete analysis. As the saying goes: "No proverb can beat a good move." Keep an open mind, trust your instincts, and remember—chess is too rich to be reduced to a set of rigid instructions.

What’s Your Experience?

Have you ever found yourself blindly following a chess principle, only to realize later that it wasn’t the best move? Or do you have a favorite rule that has consistently helped you in practical play? Share your thoughts in the comments below, and let’s discuss!
Subscribe for more chess insights, game analyses, and training tips!